Building on the theme of my Easter post about Colombian food...
Many of you are already familiar with chef, author, and travel show host Anthony Bourdain. I enjoyed a few of his books, and we've are at the now-closed DC location of his Les Halles restaurant a few times. While we don't watch his TV show No Reservations regularly, I do enjoy it whenever I happen to catch an episode.
Anyway, Tony recently went to Colombia to sample the food. Although he didn't go to Cali specifically, the foods he ate are by in large similar to what the Caleños eat. So, check it out below. It's divided into five parts:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
More on Colombian Food
Posted by William at 11:58 AM 1 comments
Monday, April 13, 2009
Easter Lunch
Diana and I went out for a lovely Easter lunch yesterday--Colombian style. In addition to being delicious, the meal doubled as research for this here blog. What better way to get you all excited about going to Colombia that to post more photos like this one: 
(By the way, that photo was taken from the camera on my new cell phone.)
Diana had a very nice soup called Sancocho de Gallina--a tasty broth filled with chicken, corn, potato, and yuca. It's simple and delicious, and a very typical Caleño (from Cali, Colombia) meal.
In honor of the holiday, I had the dish listed on the menu as "Ave Maria Pues." It was delicious and enormous. As you can see, it included: carne asada (steak), plantanos maduros (plantains), arroz (rice), chorizo (sausage), frijoles (beans), arepa (similar to a biscuit), and chicharones
(Similar to pork rinds), and a whole lot of awesome.
Posted by William at 9:46 AM 0 comments
Thursday, April 2, 2009
A Little Bit about Cali
Since most of you have never been to Colombia before, you're probably quite curious about what it will be like. If you're like me, it can be a bit difficult to picture life in Cali.
We found a video online that I think will help. It's produced by a local hotel--one of the ones we were considering, but ultimately didn't choose--so it's definitely designed to give a favorable impression. But it also shows the Cali I saw on my visit there last fall.
Check it out by clicking here. You'll probably want to watch both the main "Concierge Video Tour" and "Discover" at least.
And of course, to learn more, you can always turn to Wikipedia.
Posted by William at 12:45 PM 0 comments
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Wedding Photographers
At last, the first of the long-promised wedding related posts. Are you surprised that it's coming from me, rather than Diana? Yeah, me too.
We're starting to hone in on a lot of the details surrounding the wedding, although we still have a long way to go. One of the areas I've been put in charge of is selecting a photographer. Getting a good collection of photos is important to me, so it's a job I'm comfortable handling.
We're giving some thought to bringing a photographer with us from the USA--there are some advantages to being able to meet with the photographer before and after the weddding, both to coordinate and to deal with final purchases and prints. However, we're also looking at various "homegrown talents" in Colombia, trying to see if there is a solution there that would make more sense.
We've finally managed to find three good ones there. I'll be sifting through their portfolios myself, but I thought I'd take advantage of a little bit of crowd-sourcing and see what y'all think.
So, click through to the three links below, and look for their portfolios (a.k.a. galerias). Then, come back here, and use the poll just to the right of this post to vote!
The candidates are:
If you have other suggestions or thoughts, please leave them in the comments to this post!
Labels: wedding
Posted by William at 4:33 PM 2 comments
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Earth Time
To venture away from the topic of our lives in LA and of Tuckerian dopplegangers a bit -- and to stall while we all eagerly await Diana's first blog post and the juicy wedding tidbits that promises -- I'd like to share some thoughts that came to me after a surprisingly controversial / engaging Tweet.
Last night, after a day where I was trying to contact some potential Google Lunar X PRIZE teams in a variety of time zones, I tossed off a quick tweet without much thought:
With Google Lunar X PRIZE teams all over the world, timezones are pretty annoying things. Can we all just adopt Earth Time or something?
Well, that one little tweet I tossed off last night sure garnered a lot of attention. I got something like 8 public replies, 1 or 2 private replies, and one lengthy, offline email. Not something I expected at all! A number of those replies were similar--people who hadn't quite understood the background of my post was frustration with the fact that not everyone was awake and at work at the same times I am, and thought instead that I simply was aware of UTC / Zulu time or other similar universal standards for time telling. Another response, from a proper Manx gentleman, jokingly told me that a universal timezone had been tried before (the British with Greenwich Mean Time). But the detailed email was driving at a deeper question. It came from a friend who is just polishing off a PhD in Informatics, and who is highly interested in the scientific study of how large and/or distributed groups work together. He's done a lot of cool research at a number of impressive places, and is thinking forward to what he'll do after his thesis defense in May. He asked me:
What makes you think adopting Earth Time would solve the problem(s) you imply in your tweet? You are as globally-working a person as anyone and this issue has long been a bit intractable, so I'm interested in any thoughts you might have about it. ... Time zones have always represented a tension between local needs and global needs for interaction and coordination. The obvious problem with a single Earth Time is that it reifies 1-3 zones' inhabitants'
"normal" workdays and the other 35 or so have to adapt their work to it. One approach might be to reify the time zone that is least populated so as to inconvenience the most people more or less equally. Hard to sell that one, though. Another option is Unix Epoch Time, but non-geeks won't get it. ... However, I do think the increasing ubiquity of mobile and computational infrastructures/services can afford increasing temporal fluidity in our choices about our interactions with others ... but I'm not yet sure of how the problem might be addressed.
I thought it was a pretty interesting question, so I took advantage of a few minutes to come up with a response and some thoughts of my own about how the issue of time and timezones impacts me through my job.
In reality, I find the issue of time zones and global dispersion of our various teams / partners (see graphic at right, click to enlarge) to be a minor annoyance, not a major problem. The annoyance level has increased slightly now that I live out in LA--though that could be related to the fact that I now have to deal with a 3 hour time difference when talking to my family in addition to the time differences I have to deal with at work.Mainly, though, the issue of time zones comes into play in conjunction with my ethical obligation to try to provide an equivalent level of service to a roster of teams that spans a wide range of longitudes. Seeking to provide a totally level playing field is probably impossible for a lot of reasons--for instance, budgetary concerns will also make us tempted to hold events such as team summits here in the USA, and our brand name and network of contents are far better here in US than abroad, especially in non-English speaking languages. That's something we and our teams have accepted and are now more or less comfortable with dealing with. But for some reason, it is much more frustrating to deal with this uneven playing field when we are arranging things like telephone calls, web seminars, and other 'virtual world' events--it is less acceptable to have a 'longitude bias,' but the longitude bias still makes planning things very, very difficult.
Again, this is likely compounded by factors like language barriers, common attendance of public events, and (least important, in my experience) cultural differences. But I seem to inevitably develop a closer working relationship with teams here in North America than I do with teams in Europe, and closer for European teams than for Asian teams. Our team from China and one of our two teams from Malaysia remain the only GLXP teams I have not yet met in person, so I haven't had that relationship-building experience--and both those teams and I have the knowledge that any telephone communication will by necessity need to be planned in advance and, even with advance planning, will be quite inconvenient for one of us.
Having everyone on the planet operate on a single time zone--or maybe even two or three time zones with a total separation of no more than ~6 hours, to ensure some level of work-day overlap--would potentially remove a big part of this latitude bias. However (and here's where we leave observations of personal experience and enter full on amateur sociology hour), I'd expect that the concurrent issue of forcing some longitudinal bands of people to operate essentially nocturnally would create much larger problems than those such a solution would alleviate. Still, I wonder if some better solution is necessary / inevitable. We're already starting to see a level of public discourse about eliminating day light savings time (a custom which, by the way, shows people's willingness and ability to adapt to a system where the noon of public record is divorced from astronomical local noon)--at least I certainly saw many more stories about that this year than in any previous.
I wonder which would be a greater driver towards a radically new time system: an increasingly flat world (more global economies, more multi-national corporations, more instantaneous communications) or a situation where we have a significant human presence off-planet. In the distant future, if we take as an assumption that there will be human colonies in a variety of orbits around a variety of stars, will residents of the Earth be more likely to accept a time system that pays little attention to one's longitude? Another potential game-changer, I'd imagine, would be extremely rapid transportation systems like suborbital point-to-point or, to get a bit more fanciful, teleportation. If our transportation infrastructure can get me from New York to Shanghai in 45 minutes--but I have to deal with the world's worst case of jet lag, how does that function? How will we adopt to increase our efficiencies to deal with that new capacity?
A note for fellow geeks: yes, the clock pictured above is one of John Harrison's the Longitude Prize winners.
Labels: musings
Posted by William at 6:58 PM 4 comments
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Further Evidence
A little deeper investigation into the Phil-as-Violinist issue.
Here's a side-by-side comparison of Phil, looking like a jaunty pirate, and the LA Chamber Orchestra's violinist. Judge for yourself!
Posted by William at 8:25 AM 2 comments
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Bizarro Phil?
So, Diana's only met Philip -- the infamous author-cum-teacher -- once, whereas I've spent approximately a billion hours with him. However, she also has a much better memory for how people look than I do. So, I don't know, should I believe her when she says that the guy in this giant billboard looks just like Phil?
Labels: LA
Posted by William at 11:33 AM 1 comments